Tobacco companies are at a major crossroads in their firm, with significant attacks originating from two separate fronts. To begin with, the known health concerns regarding tobacco smoking are causing a lot of states to pass public smoking restrictions.
On another facet, makers of e-cigs are convincing more and more people to make the switch to electronic smokes in order to satisfy their dependence on nicotine, while having the ability to use their goods in places tobacco cigarettes are already banned.
It isn’t shocking to discover tobacco companies do not like the popularity e-cigs are enjoying. As increasing numbers of people make the switch, tobacco companies are looking for ways to guard their dwindling profits from the sale of cigarettes.
Why don’t the tobacco companies MAKE a product for consumer consumption, rather than fight the industry? Consumers enjoy being able to “smoke” while engaging in indoor activities, especially ones that were commonly associated in the past, such as playing poker or driving with their families, or tending to their fish?
It is realistic that most of the lobbying efforts utilized in an attempt to have smokeless cigarettes, or at least the liquid nicotine they normally use, made a drug to be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, were favored by tobacco corporations.
The efforts failed in recent court rulings and they are nevertheless regulated mostly by the sales prohibition to minors. Since many of the stand-alone cigarette retailers may be owned or operated by tobacco companies, the sale of electronic cigarettes has mostly been restricted to online sales.
As increasing numbers of smokers switch to using electronic cigarettes, tobacco companies are getting a lot more aggressive in trying to stop public electric cigarette use.
Because e-cigs don’t really burn or release second hand smoke, most electronic cigarette makers are firm in their thinking they mustn’t be prohibited in no-smoking regions.
However, tobacco companies counter that the nicotine vapor they give off is equally as dangerous and addictive as nicotine provided through tobacco. In addition they point out the small vapor cloud that’s often present for a few seconds when the e-cig is inhaled as being proof that second-hand nicotine vapor still offers a health hazard.
Of course, there is not any scientific research to back these claims up. Rather, the tobacco companies are just putting concern in the minds of prospective consumers. These anxious consumers are comfortable with using standard tobacco cigarettes and as a result of negative publicity, they don’t even take into account switching to e-cigarettes.
Furthermore, large tobacco companies won’t give credit to the matter of fire safety connected with e-cigs given that the units do not require fire to be lighted.
They discuss that the liquid nicotine within e-cigs is risky to pets and youngsters if they’re allowed access to the replacement cartridges that contain the nicotine. Having said that, this is correct of classic cigarettes, too.
The battle between e-cig producers and large tobacco firms isn’t nearly over. The truth is, smokeless cigarettes have excellent potential to take customers faraway from tobacco companies, which is very worrisome for large tobacco enterprises.
Thus, tobacco companies are willing to do anything whatsoever and everything to make electric cigarettes seem like an unworthy alternate choice for those who choose to smoke.